Judge Koh also dismissed class action lawsuit claims based on California privacy law, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate the private data they alleged was disclosed by Zoom.
“Zoom merely ‘ provid neutral tools for navigating’ its service.” “ The bulk of Plaintiffs’ Zoombombing claims lie against the ‘ Zoombombers ’ who shared heinous content, not Zoom itself,” noted the judge in her order. The provision is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and Judge Koh agreed that Zoom was immune from claims stemming from third parties who subjected unwitting meeting participants to disruptive material. Zoom argued that a provision in federal law immunizing web service providers from the actions of third parties on its platforms shielded the company from allegations that it should have done more to protect users from Zoombombings. District Judge Lucy Koh seemed to agree with Zoom about some of the claims, however the judge allowed allegations regarding Zoom’s business practices and breach of contract to remain.
0 kommentar(er)
